|
CLAIM AS MUJADDID
BORN IN 1835 in Qadian, India, the Founder had, by the
1880's, become known for his piety, sterling character,
extremely religious life-style, and absorption in prayer and
other requirements of Islam, and his deep and life-long
study of the Holy Qur'an and other Islamic literature. He
was also known and highly regarded for his services in the
defense of Islam, which was, in the nineteenth century CE,
under severe attack from Christian missionaries and
orientalists, and like-minded opponents of Islam (such as
the Hindu Arya Samaj). So that when, during the years
1880-1884, he wrote his famous book Baraheen-e-Ahmadiyya, it
was acclaimed by all and sundry among the Muslims (including
the Ulema) as the best book on Islam in a long time. To
quote Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi, leader of the then
powerful and active Ahle Hadith Muslims:
'In our opinion, this book in this age, and to meet the
present circumstances, is such that the like of it has not
been written up to this time in Islam, and nothing can be
said about the future, Allah may (if He wishes) bring about
another matter (like this). Its author, too, has proved
himself to be firmly staunch in helping the cause of Islam
with his money, with his pen and his tongue, and with his
personal religious
experiences3.
And he has done this (service) to such an extent that an
example of it is rarely met with among the Muslims who have
gone before. If anyone considers these words of ours to be
Asiatic exaggeration, let him point out to us at least one
such book as has in it such forceful refutation of all
classes of the opponents of Islam, especially the Arya
Samaj, and let him give us the particulars of two or three
persons as the helpers of the cause of Islam who, besides
serving Islam with their money and their personal efforts
and their pens and their tongues, have also come forward
with their religious experiences and have proclaimed, as
against the opponents of Islam and the deniers of
revelation, the manly challenge that whoever doubted the
truth of revelation might come to them and witness the truth
thereof, and have made (even) the non-Muslims witness the
same.' (Isha'at-us-Sunnah, Vol. 7, June-November l884;
italics ours).
Could there be a more glowing testimonial to the man, his
services to Islam and his spiritual attainments than the
above, from the pen of an eminent Aalim (Maulana) of the
time?
It should be evident from the above enthusiastic
testimonial that the Founder had by then laid claim to
Divine revelation. No exception had been taken to it by any
religious leader of Islam. And how could any exception be
taken, because:
(a) The Holy Qur'an and the Hadith speak of revelation
continuing in Islam as evidence of its being the only
religion (others having been corrupted) which can make man
attain to Allah, the sign of which always was that Allah
spoke to such a man. What terminated with the Holy Prophet
Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was wahy
an-nubuwwat (the revelation of prophethood which brought
revealed books). But wahy al-wilayat (the revelation of
sainthood) continues in Islam as the sign of its acceptance
to Allah.
(b) Several saints, before Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
Sahib, had also laid claim to receiving revelation, and they
are revered throughout the world of Islam.
Mujaddid
In the same masterly book Baraheen-e-Ahmadiyya, Hazrat
Mirza Sahib had mentioned towards the end that he had been
appointed by Allah to be the Mujaddid (reformer) of the
fourteenth century Hijra. And nobody took exception to that.
Again, how could anybody do that, because the institution of
Mujaddid is well-recognized and well-established in Islam?
Apart from indirect references in the Holy Qur'an, the Holy
Prophet's announcement is clear on the subject:
'Verily, Allah shall raise for this Ummat (community), at
the beginning of every one hundred years, one who will
reform for it its religion' (Abu Dawood, Kitab-us-Sunan,
chapter 'Al-Malahim,' Vol. 2, p. 241).
The scholars of Hadith are unanimous in declaring this
Hadith to be sound. And its correctness is further
corroborated by the fact that in each century Hijra the
Reformer of that century, sometimes more than one, laid
claim to be the Divinely appointed Mujaddid. These Mujaddids
(whose list is given in the Appendix) were the most
outstanding Muslim saints of their times. And so was Hazrat
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib. That is why no exception was taken
to his claim. It is worth noting that no other person
claimed to be the Mujaddid of the fourteenth century Hijra
(which is now ended). So we ask the question, to which no
reply has been given by any opponent of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad Sahib: If he was not the Mujaddid of the fourteenth
century Hijra, who else was?
And neither has any Muslim scholar had the courage to
deny the correctness of the Hadith about Mujaddids or the
truthfulness of those who claimed to be Mujaddids before
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib.
The question remaining to be answered on our part is:
After being accepted as Mujaddid and the recipient of Divine
revelation by hundreds of thousands of Muslims, including
outstanding Ulema, who joined him, and also by others who
did not join him but took no exception to his claims, why
was Hazrat Mirza Sahib later denounced and condemned by his
opponents? For the answer, please see Chapter 3, 'The
Promised Messiah.' But before that, certain preconditions
for the advent of the Promised Messiah have to be explained,
as in the next chapter.
|