TRIBUTES TO THE FOUNDER
(BY NON-AHMADIS)
HAVING ACHIEVED in twenty years what others could not
have done in 200 years, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya
Movement, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib, passed away on
May 26, 1908, at Lahore. The last words on his tongue were,
'Allah, my beloved Allah.' To his beloved Allah he went
back, to Whom he belonged. May Allah shower his choicest
favours and blessings on him. Ameen!
Tributes paid to him, on his death, were galore. But we
reproduce below only a few selected ones from non-Ahmadis to
show what his contemporaries (other than his followers)
thought, who also had watched him lead a spotlessly clean,
pious and Godfearing life, and conduct almost single-handed
Jihad on innumerable fronts.
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was an outstanding religious
leader of the subcontinent and an author, who later joined
the political movement against the British, went to prison,
and ultimately became, after independence, the Federal
Minister of Education in the Nehru Government of India. He
was acting as the editor of the Vakeel of Amritsar (Punjab),
a paper of high standing, during the temporary absence of
its permanent editor, Maulana Abdullah Al-Imadi, when Hazrat
Mirza Sahib passed away. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad wrote the
following editorial on the deceased:
'That man, that very great man, whose pen was a magic
wand and whose tongue was spell-binding; that man whose
brain was a complex of wonders, whose eye could revive the
dying and whose call aroused those in their graves, whose
fingers held the wires of revolution [moral, spiritual and
religious] and whose two fists were two powerful batteries;
that man who for 30 years was for the religious world an
earth-shaking quake, who, like the trumpet of the doomsday,
awakened those lost in the slumber of this life, left this
world empty-handed. This bitter death, this cup of poison,
which entrusted the deceased to the dust, will remain on
thousands, nay millions, of tongues, as the words of bitter
disappointment and regret. The stroke of death which
slaughtered, along with one who was very much alive, the
hopes and longings of many, and the wails it raises of
lament, will remain in memories for a long time to come.
'The passing away of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib Qadiani is
not such an event that a lesson should not be learnt from
it, nor should one be content with consigning it to the
passage of time to efface. Such people who cause a
revolution in the religious world, or the world of
intellect, do not come into this world often. These sons of
history in whom it rightly takes pride are very rarely seen
on the world scene, and when they do come they demonstrate
to the world a revolution to remember.
'In spite of our serious differences with Mirza Sahib in
respect of some of his claims and beliefs, his separation
for ever has convinced the educated and enlightened Muslims
that one of their very great personages has left them. And
with him the mighty defense of Islam against its opponents,
which was linked with his person, has come to an end. His
peculiarity that he performed against the enemies of Islam
the duty of a victorious general, compels us to express
openly our feeling that the grand movement which for a long
time defeated and trod over our enemies should be continued
in the future also, and that too -if ill-fortune does not
obstruct peace and good-fellowship [between Muslims]- with
the compulsory partnership required by a joint duty, and in
consonance with the blessed principles of Islamic consensus.
'Mirza Sahib appeared in the front line of lovers who for
Islam accepted the dedication to sacrifice their time from
the cradle, through the springs and autumns, to their graves
in fulfilling the pledge of loyalty to their beautiful
beloved (Islam). Sayyid Ahmad, Ghulam Ahmad, Rahmatullah,
Ali Hassan, Wazir Khan and Abul Mansoor, these were men who
were foremost and in front (in the service of Islam) and who
took on its defense and were busy in that effort till the
end
É
'Mirza Sahib's literature which was produced by him in
his confrontation with the Christians and the Arya Samajists
has received the seal of general approval. And in this
peculiarity, he stands in need of no introduction. We have
to recognize the value and greatness of that literature from
the bottom of our hearts, now that he has completed his
task. That is because the time when Islam was surrounded and
was under attack from all sides cannot be effaced from our
minds nor forgotten. And the Muslims who were entrusted with
the safety of Islam by the Real Saviour, in this world of
material means and causes, were lying flat sobbing in the
aftermath of their shortcomings. And they were doing nothing
for Islam, or perhaps they could do nothing. On the one hand
the attacks were so virulent that the whole of Christendom
was bent on blowing out the light of Islam, which alone
enlightened the true reality, as it [Christendom] found it
to be an obstruction in the way [of its darkness]. And the
powerful forces of wiliness and wealth were behind the back
of these attackers. On the other hand the weakness of the
defense [of Islam] was such as if against the enemy's
cannons they did not have even arrows. And counter-attack or
defense did not exist whatsoever. Because, against reality
and through the misfortunes of our evil deeds, the Muslims
were held to be the moving spirit behind the riots of 1857,
therefore in all Christian countries, particularly in
England, there was a storm of political agitation against
the Muslims. And the Christian missionaries exploited it no
less than their ancestors who exhorted the Christians to
fight the Crusades. Just about when their religious passions
were about to cure their hereditary rancour of twelve to
thirteen centuries by achieving its objective, the defense
of Islam began, in which Mirza Sahib had a part. That
defense not only shattered to pieces the initial influence
which Christianity had because of its being under the
protection and promotion of the Government. And thousands,
nay, millions of Muslims were saved from this dangerous
attack which deserved to succeed otherwise. Not only that,
but the talisman of Christianity itself was blown away like
smoke É
'So, this service rendered by Mirza Sahib will place the
coming generations under a debt of gratitude, in that he by
joining the front rank of those waging Jihad by the pen
discharged their duty to defend Islam. And he has left as
his memorial a literature which will last so long as the
Muslims have blood running in their veins and the
championship of Islam is visible as their national symbol.
'Apart from that, Mirza Sahib performed a very special
service of Islam by crushing the poisonous fangs of the Arya
Samaj É The writings he produced highlight the claim that
they cannot possibly be overlooked however much the defense
of Islam may be enlarged in future.
'Natural ability, application and dexterity, and
continuous debates [with the opponents of Islam] had lent
Mirza Sahib a special splendour. He had vast knowledge, not
only of his own religion, but also of other religions. And
he used to make use of his vast knowledge with great
finesse. His preaching and persuasion had acquired such
ability that the person addressed, whatever his ability or
his faith, was thrown into deep thought by his spontaneous
reply É It cannot be questioned that Mirza Sahib had a
special ability to make Islam prevail over all other
religions É It is not likely that a person of his status
will be born in the religious world of Hindustan [now India
and Pakistan] who would devote his highest talents like him
to the study of religions.'
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, who wrote the above tribute, was
a master of Urdu, Persian and Arabic languages and an artist
of Urdu diction. It has not therefore been easy to translate
him, and we are conscious of the inadequacy of the above
rendering.
The permanent editor of the paper Vakeel of Amritsar,
Maulana Abdullah Al-Imadi, soon returned to his editorial
chair and added his own tribute as follows on May 30, 1908:
'Although Mirza Sahib had not received systematic
education in the current knowledge and theology, yet a close
assessment of his person shows that he was born with a
unique temperament which is not given to each and every
person. By virtue of his study and upright nature, he had
attained mastery over religious literature. In about 1877,
when he was 35 or 36 years old, we find him charged with an
unusual religious fervour. He leads a life of a true and
pious Muslim. His mind is immune from the worldly
temptations. He is as happy in solitude as if he were in
congenial company. Even when he is in company, he is busy
enjoying the pleasures of solitude. We find him restless. It
appears as if he is searching for a lost thing, which has no
trace in the mortal world. Islam with all its glories has so
overwhelmed his person that sometimes he is holding debates
with the Arya Samajists, sometimes he is writing voluminous
books to highlight the truth of Islam. His debates in
Hoshiarpur in 1886 were so delightful that one cannot forget
their pleasant impact on one's mind. As a counterblast to
other religions, he has written some unique books which
expound the glories of Islam. Their perusal is so inspiring
that their effect has not yet faded. His Baraheen Ahmadiyya
overwhelmed the non Muslims and overjoyed the Muslims. He
has given a captivating picture of religion É As to his
character, there is not a trace of any blot on it. He lived
a pious life. He was God-fearing all his life. In short, his
fifty years of moral integrity, clean habits and sterling
services to religion, raised him to the enviable position of
great prominence among the Indian Muslims' (Akhbar Vakeel,
Amritsar, May 30, 1908).
Ch. Afzal Haq, President, Jamiat-e-Ahrar, wrote:
'Before Arya Samaj came into being, Islam had almost been
like a dead body. The Muslims had lost their sense of
mission. Dayanand's endeavour to create suspicions against
Islam alerted the Muslims for a while. But they soon fell
into deep slumber. Among the Muslims no organization came
into existence for the propagation of Islam. But there was
one soul which was restless at the indifference of the
Muslims. He got round him a small Jamaat and went ahead to
preach Islam. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad instilled in his Jamaat an
unrelaxing zeal for the propagation of Islam. This was a
noble example not only for the Muslims of various sects but
also an inspiration for the missionary organizations and
Jamaats in the entire Muslim world, (Fitna-i-Irtidad aur
Siyas Qalabazian, p. 46).
The daily Zamindar (editor, Maulana Zafar Ali Khan)
wrote:
'Mirza Sahib faced the Hindu and the Christian religions
very ably. His books entitled Surma Chashma-e-Arya and
Chashma Masihi, etc., are very good books against the Arya
Samajists and the Christians, (Zamindar, September 12,
1923).
Maulvi Noor Muhammad Sahib, Qadri Naqshbandi Chishti,
wrote:
'Then Maulvi Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani stood up and challenged
the churchmen and their community and said, "Christ, by
whose name you swear, died like all human beings, and I am
the Jesus whose advent is predicted." By this method, he
made things so hot for the Nazarenes that they were hard put
to make good their escape. By this very method, he put to
rout the Padres both in India and England' (Preface to the
commentary on the Holy Qur'an by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi,
p. 30, 1934 edition).
The editor of the monthly magazine Nigar wrote:
'Mirza Sahib was a passionate lover of Rasool (peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him) and a sincere man of action.
I found him a believer in the Finality of Prophethood and a
lover of the Holy Prophet in the true sense of the word. I
also studied his life and works and found him a man of
action, courage and determination. He discerned the true
significance of religion and presented Islam in the manner
which is reminiscent of the times of the Holy Messenger
(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and the pious
Caliphs' (Nigar, November 1961).
Shamsul Ulema Maulana Sayyid Mir Hassan Sahib, who was
the teacher of Allama Dr. Sir Muhammad Iqbal, wrote:
'Hazrat Mirza Sahib came to Sialkot in 1864 during his
service. He lived there. As he was a pious man, he was
averse to trivial and nonsensical talk. He lived in
aloofness. He did not relish meeting people as it was a
sheer waste of time' (Hayat-i- Tayyebah, p . 29, compiled by
Sheikh Abdul Qadir).
The same scholar said on another occasion:
'It is a pity that we did not appreciate him [Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad]. I cannot describe his spiritual excellences.
His life was not like the life of ordinary people but he was
one of those who are special servants of Allah and come into
this world only occasionally' (Al-Hakam, dated 7th April,
1934).
Doctor Sir Muhammad Iqbal, Ph.D., Barrister-at-Law,
philosopher and poet of international repute, said while the
Promised Messiah was still alive:
'Amongst the present Muslims of the sub-continent [now
India and Pakistan] Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is the
greatest religious thinker' (magazine Indian Antiquary of
September 1900).
Shamsul Ulema Maulana Sayyid Mumtaz Ali, editor of
Tehzib-e-Niswan, Lahore, wrote:
'The late Mirza Sahib was a very saintly and exalted
personage. And he had such spiritual power born of virtue
that it could enslave the most hard-hearted persons. He was
a very knowledgeable scholar, a reformer of high resolve and
an exemplar of the purest life. Although we did not believe
in him as the Promised Messiah, his guidance and leadership
in fact performed the Messianic revival of those spiritually
dead.'
Allama Niaz Fatehpuri wrote on three occasions as
follows:
'Whatever I have studied so far about the Founder of
Ahmadiyyat, and not only I but whoever studies the
circumstances of his life and his character with sincerity
and in search of the truth, he will have to admit that he
[the Founder of Ahmadiyyat] was a lover of the Prophet in
the correct sense, in that he had a very sincere concern and
anxiety for Islam.'
'I can say without affectation that he [the Founder] was
a man of unusual resolve and constancy and a man of
prescience and perception.'
'Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib defended Islam well, and he did
so at a time when the greatest of the Ulema could not dare
to face the enemies of Islam.'
(The Nigar, Lucknow, July 1960, November 1955 and October
1 960.)
Hazrat Khwaja Ghulam Farid Sahib
This venerable saint was the Pir of Chachran Shareef (now
in the Punjab). He said:
'Mirza Sahib is a good and virtuous person. He sent me a
book containing the revelations received by him. That book
alone shows his spiritual excellence. He is a true person in
his claims. He is not a forger or a liar' (book
Isharat-e-Faridi, Vol. 3, p. 42).
'Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib Qadiani is on truth. In his
affair he is truthful and correct. Day and night he is
engrossed in the service of Allah. And for the progress of
Islam and raising aloft the matter of religion, he strives
with his life. I see nothing wrong or undesirable in him. If
he has claimed to be Mahdi and 'Isa (Messiah) even that is
something permissible' (Isharat-e-Faridi, Vol. 3, p. 79).
'Mirza Sahib spends all his time in the service of Allah,
prayer and recitation of the Holy Qur'an and similar other
preoccupations. He is so resolved to champion Islam that he
has invited Queen Victoria of England to accept Islam.
Similarly he has invited the Kings of France, Russia, and
other countries to accept Islam. All his efforts are for the
purpose that the creed of Trinity and the Cross, or total
disbelief or godlessness, should be finished off, and in
their place the Unity of God should be established on earth.
Look at the Ulema of the time that, leaving alone all false
creeds, they have attacked this good man who is a complete
follower of the Prophet of Allah, and he is on the right
path and shows guidance to others. Such a venerable man who
is perfect in all respects has been condemned as kafir
[heretic] although if you see his writings they show that
they are beyond the capacity of a human being. And all that
he says is totally full of inner knowledge and truths, and
it is wholly the path of true guidance. And he is not a
disbeliever in the faith of the Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat and
the requirements of the religion of Muhammad'
(Isharat-e-Faridi, Vol. 3' p. 66).
Maulvi Sirajuddin Sahib
He was the father of Maulvi Zafar Ali Khan, editor of the
daily Zamindar of Lahore. He wrote:
'I can say from personal observation that Mirza Sahib was
even in his youth a very virtuous, God-fearing and a
venerable person É He was free from pretense or forgery in
matters of religion É Personally we did not have the honour
of believing in his claims or revelations but we consider
him to be a perfect Muslim' (The Zamindar, dated 8 June
1908).
Further Tributes
Maulvi Sayyid Waheedudin, editor Aligarh Institute
Gazette, wrote:
'The deceased [Mirza Sahib] wielded the sword of Islam
very well against Christianity, Arya Samaj and Brahmo Samaj
É There is no doubt that he was a great warrior of Islam'
(Aligarh Institute Gazette, June 1908).
Maulvi Bashiruddin, editor Sadiqul Akhbar, Rewari (UP
India), wrote:
'Because Mirza Sahib had with his forceful speeches and
magnificent writings silenced the enemies of Islam for ever,
after giving telling replies to all criticisms, and had
proved that truth is after all the truth, and because Mirza
Sahib had in fact left no stone unturned in the service of
Islam and had fulfilled all the requirements of the
championship of Islam, justice requires that one should
condole the sudden and untimely death of such a firmly
resolved defender of Islam and the helper of Islam, and an
eminent and irreplaceable scholar' (Sadiqul Akhbar, May
1908).
Mirza Hairat Dehlavi, editor The Curzorz Gazette, Delhi,
wrote:
'The services of the deceased which he rendered to Islam
in confrontation with the Christians and the Arya Samajists
deserve the highest praise. He completely changed the tone
of debate. And he laid the foundation of a new literature in
the sub-continent [now India and Pakistan]. Not only as a
Muslim but also as a seeker after truth, we admit that the
biggest Christian missionary could not dare to open his
mouth against the Mirza Sahib. Although he was a Punjabi,
but his pen was so powerful that today in the whole of Hind
[now India and Pakistan], nobody could write so forcefully.
There was a vast store of words, full of emotion and force,
in his head. And when he sat down to write, there was such a
flow of choice, chaste words that it is impossible to
describe it É Although there is in places a tinge of the
Punjabi dialect in his Urdu, even so his forceful literature
is completely unique in its magnificence. And in reality
some of his writings make one go into ecstasy. Among his
followers there are not only common people but also very
able graduates and M.A.'s, and very scholarly Ulema too. Is
it not enough matter for pride that among his disciples
there are scholars of both the traditional and modern kinds?
He predicted the destruction of his enemies, and in the
teeth of opposition and the fire of criticisms he cleared
his passage and reached the zenith of progress. On every
claim he made, there were exclamations of "We believe, and
we attest its truth" from his disciples. And every person
can draw the conclusion from these acclamations what success
he achieved in his lifetime' (Curzon Gazette, June 1, 1908).
Pir Mehr Ali Shah of Golra Sharif Punjab:
'Imam Jalal-ud-Din Sayuti (may peace be on him) says that
there are certain stages of spiritual progress where many
servants of Allah become the Messiah and Mahdi. I cannot
say whether he [Hazrat Mirza Sahib] is only at that stage or
whether he is the same Mahdi promised for this Ummat [Muslim
nation] by the Holy Prophet, but he [Mirza Sahib] is proving
to be a cutting sword against false religions and is
certainly Divinely aided' (Al-Hakam, dated June 24' 1904, p.
5).
Lastly, let us quote an eminent Christian, the British
editor of the famous Pioneer of Allahabad, which was held in
high esteem:
'If one of the Israelite prophets of the past could come
down from heaven to preach, then in the circumstances of the
twentieth century he would be as misfit as was Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad Sahib of Qadian who died recently in his native Punjab
É [a study of him] would have thrown a new light on the
prophets of Beni Israel. But our narrow and limited horizons
of thought prevent such a comparison because our religious
literature is enclosed within a narrow circle É'
Even this cynical Christian writer could see the
resemblance between the Promised Messiah and the prophets of
Israel!
|