|
1.2 Muslim
perspective
(Note: the rest of chapter one is an expansion of
the original response to Mr. J's letter)
Thank you Mr. J for your most
thought provoking letter. I would also like to thank you for
the knowledge you have provided therein. In what is to
follow I have striven to avoid objectionable or
disrespectful wording. This is an academic exchange and not
a slug-fest. I am however human. If one or two cases have
slipped by me then I apologize in advance for them. They
were not intentional. I also realize that this is quite a
lengthy response for someone to read in one sitting.
However, I ask the reader to try to do so and not to pass
judgment until they have managed to receive a complete
picture. Now, the response:
The three faiths, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, all
purport to share one fundamental concept: belief in God as
the Supreme Being, the Creator and Sustainer of the
Universe. Known as "Tawhid" in Islam, this concept of
Oneness of God was stressed by Moses (pbuh) in the Biblical
passage Known as the "Shema," or the Jewish creed of
faith:
"Hear, O Israel The Lord our God is one Lord"
Deuteronomy 6:4
It was repeated word-for-word approximately 1500 years
later by Jesus (pbuh) when he said
"...The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O
Israel; the Lord our God is one Lord."
Mark 12:29
Muhammad (pbuh) came along approximately 600 years later,
bringing the same message again:
"And your God is One God: there is no god but He"
The noble Qur'an, al-Bakarah(2):163
Christianity has digressed from the concept of the
Oneness of God, however, into a vague and mysterious
doctrine that was formulated during the fourth century CE
(see historical details in section 1.2.5). This doctrine,
which continues to be the source of controversy both within
and outside the Christian religion, is known as the Doctrine
of the Trinity. Simply put, the Christian doctrine of the
Trinity states that God is the union of three divine
persons - the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit - in
one divine being. Christians must guard themselves
from ever claiming that they worship three gods since this
would be a heresy of the worst kind. Christians are
commanded to always refer to them all as ONE God. This
belief, as we shall soon see in coming chapters, was first
put to words in the famous "Creed of Nicea" in 325C.E. Among
other things, it says:
"Whoever wishes to be saved must, above all, keep the
Catholic faith. For unless a person keeps this faith whole
and entire he will undoubtedly be lost forever. This is what
the Catholic faith teaches: we worship one God in the
Trinity and the Trinity in unity. We distinguish among the
persons, but we do not divide the substance. For the Father
is a distinct person; the Son is a distinct person; and the
Holy Spirit is a distinct person. Still the Father and the
Son and the Holy Spirit have one divinity, equal glory, and
coeternal majesty. What the Father is, the Son is, and the
Holy Spirit is. The Father is uncreated, the Son is
uncreated, and the Holy Spirit is uncreated. The Father is
boundless, the Son is boundless, and the Holy Spirit is
boundless. The Father is eternal, the Son is eternal, and
the Holy Spirit is eternal. Nevertheless, there are not
three eternal beings, but one eternal being. Thus there are
not three uncreated beings, nor three boundless beings, but
one uncreated being and one boundless being. Likewise, the
Father is omnipotent, the Son is omnipotent, and the Holy
Spirit is omnipotent. Yet there are not three omnipotent
beings, but one omnipotent being. Thus the Father is God,
the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. But there are
not three gods, but one God. The Father is Lord, the Son is
Lord, and the Holy Spirit is Lord. There as not three lords,
but one Lord. For according to Christian truth, we must
profess that each of the persons individually is God; and
according to Christian religion we are forbidden to say that
there are three gods or lords.
But the entire three
persons are coeternal and coequal with one another
.So
that, as we have said, we worship complete unity in the
Trinity and the Trinity in unity. This, then, is what he who
wishes to be saved must believe about the Trinity
.This
is the Catholic faith. Everyone must believe it, firmly and
steadfastly; otherwise He cannot be saved. Amen."
Christian sects are many and varied. However, the
majority of Christians the world over believe in the
following four basic concepts:
- The Trinity,
- The divine Sonship of Jesus (pbuh),
- The original sin, and
- The death of "the Son of God" on the cross in
atonement for the original sin of Adam.
Everything else is pretty much relegated into the
background. A Christian can be saved and enter heaven by
simply believing in the above creeds. According to St. Paul,
the previous law and commandments of God are worthless, this
simple belief will guarantee for all comers eternal
salvation. For example, St. Paul is quoted to have said:
"Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by
faith without the deeds of the law."
Romans 3:28.
The words of Saint Paul are held by most of Christianity
in the highest regard, and this is understandable since he
is the primary author of the majority of the books of the
New Testament. However, no matter what role St. Paul played
in the definition and spread of Christianity, when
displaying respect for the teachings of Paul, it is
necessary not to lose sight of the fact that he is in no way
equal to Jesus, nor should his command be placed before the
command of Jesus if we were to find them to differ from one
another. No one, not even Paul or the apostles of Jesus has
this right, since they are all, after all, subordinate to
Jesus Christ himself.
However, were we to study the religion known today as
"Christ"ianity, we would find that it is the interpretation
of St. Paul of what he personally believed to be the
religion of Jesus(pbuh). Christianity as it stands today has
been reduced to an interpretation of the words of Jesus
(pbuh) within the context of what Paul taught rather
than the other way around which is the way it should be. We
would expect Christianity to be the teachings of Jesus
(pbuh) and that the words of Paul and everyone else would be
accepted or rejected according to their conformity to these
"Jesuit" teachings. However, we will notice in what follows
that Jesus (pbuh) never in his lifetime mentioned an
original sin, or an atonement. He never asked anyone to
worship him, neither did he ever claim to be part of a
Trinity. His words and actions are those of a loyal
messenger of God who faithfully and faultlessly followed the
commands of his Lord and only told his followers to do the
same and to worship God alone (John 4:21, John
4:23, Matthew 4:10, Luke 4:8 ...etc.).
Just one of the countless examples of this placement of
the words of Paul above the words of Jesus can be seen in
the following analysis: Jesus (pbuh) is claimed to have been
prepared for his sacrifice on the cross from the beginning
of time and was a willing victim (otherwise we would have to
claim that God is a sadistic and torturous God who
forced Jesus into such a savage end). However,
whenever Jesus (pbuh) was asked about the path to "eternal
life" he consistently told his followers to only
"keep the commandments" and nothing more (Matthew
19:16-21, John 14:15, John 15:10). Not once did he himself
ever mention an original sin or a redemption. Even when
pressed for the path to "PERFECTION" he only told his
followers to sell their belongings. He departed this earth
leaving his followers with the very dire threat:
"For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth
pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the
law, till all be fulfilledJesus, Fulfillment of Law of
Moses. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least
commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the
least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and
teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of
heaven."
Matthew 5:18-19.
Obviously, heaven and earth have not yet passed. The fact
that you are reading this book bears witness to this very
simple fact. So Jesus (pbuh) is telling us that so long as
creation exists, the commandments will be required
from his followers. Anyone who will dare to say otherwise,
until the end of time, will be called "the least in the
kingdom of heaven." Jesus (pbuh) had foreseen mankind's
attempt to distort and annul his commandments, the
commandments of Moses (pbuh), which he had taught his
followers to keep and himself had kept faithfully till the
crucifixion, and was warning his followers in no uncertain
terms to be wary of all those who would attempt to do
so.
Not long after, Jesus departs. Now Saul of Tarsus (St.
Paul), a man who never met Jesus (pbuh), a man who by his
own admission persecuted the followers of Jesus (pbuh) by
every means within his power and presided over their
execution (see below), comes along. Suddenly one day St.
Paul receives a vision from Jesus (pbuh), and his whole life
is turned around. He now takes it upon himself through the
authority of his visions to spread the word of Jesus to the
whole world and to explain what Jesus really meant.
Paul claims that the law of God through Moses (pbuh) is
worthless, decaying and ready to vanish away and faith in
the crucifixion is the only requirement for a Christian to
enter heaven (Romans 3:28, Hebrews 8:13...etc.). Who do
Christians listen to, Jesus or Paul? They listen to Paul.
They take the words of Paul literally and then
"interpret" the words of Jesus (pbuh) within the context
of the words of Paul. No one takes the words of
Jesus (pbuh) literally and explains the words of
Paul within the context of Jesus' words.
According to this system of explaining the words of Jesus
within the context of Paul's teachings, Jesus never actually
means what he says but is constantly speaking in riddles
which are not to be taken literally. Even when people
attempt to cite the words of Jesus as confirming the
teachings of Paul with regard to the original sin, the
atonement, ...etc. they never bring clear and decisive
words where Jesus actually confirms these things.
Instead, they say such things as "When Jesus spoke of the
exodus he was really speaking of the atonement" or so
forth. Are we to believe that Paul is the only one who can
say what is on his mind clearly and decisively while Jesus
(pbuh) is not capable of articulating what he means clearly
and decisively but requires interpreters to explain the
"true" meaning of what he said, and to explain how,
when he spoke of the commandments, he was not talking of
"the commandments" but of a spiritual
commandment and that they will now tell you what this
spiritual commandment is that Jesus never managed to talk
clearly about?.
It is interesting to note that Jesus was not talking in
riddles when he commanded his followers to keep the
commandments but was talking of the actual physical
commandments of Moses. This can be clearly seen by reading
for instance Luke 18:20 where Jesus spells out in no
uncertain terms what he means by "keep the
commandments."
"And I (Jesus) have come confirming that which was
before me of the Torah, and to make lawful for you part of
that which was forbidden upon you. And I have come to you
with a sign from your Lord so seek refuge in Allah and obey
me"
The noble Qur'an, Aal-Umran(3):50
In the past, I have searched for a logical answer to this
puzzle by posing the following questions to respected
Christian clergy:
- According to you, Jesus is supposed to have been
prepared for the "atonement" from the beginning of time.
He should know that it is coming.
- Whenever he was asked about the path to "eternal
life" (i.e. Matthew 19:16-22 ..etc.) he
consistently told his followers to only "keep the
commandments" just as he had "kept my father's
commandments" ..etc.
- Even when he was pressed for more, he only told his
followers that in order to be PERFECT they needed
only to sell their belongings.
- Not once did he mention an "atonement" or and
"original sin."
- The commandments he spoke about were the commandments
of Moses and not some "spiritual" commandments. This can
be seen in the text itself where Jesus (pbuh) explicitly
spells out some of the commandments of Moses one by
one.
- St. Paul, a disciple of a disciple, is the one who is
followed by Christianity and not Jesus. Jesus' teachings
are explained within the context of Paul's teachings and
not vice versa.
Whenever this question would be presented to a respected
member of the Christian clergy the response would always be
the same: "Well, don't take Jesus' words literally.
St. Paul has told us in Romans ...," or "Yes, but St. Paul
tells us in Galatians ...," or "St. Paul tells us in
Corinthians .." Yet my question remains: where did
JESUS every say it? Where does the RED
ink say it? Doesn't St. Paul's authority come from Jesus? I
simply want a single clear statement from Jesus himself
where he endorsed Paul's claims and then it would be
possible to accept Paul's claim that he was indeed preaching
the "command of Jesus." If Jesus were only to say it once
then I can accept Paul repeating it a thousand times.
However, as we shall soon see, never, not even
once in his whole lifetime did Jesus (pbuh)
endorse the preachings of Paul.
Getting back to the matter at hand, the reader will
notice in Mr. J's response a surprising absence of certain
very fundamental verses usually quoted by any Christian man
or woman off the street in defense of the "Trinity" and
other issues. The reader may further surmise that Mr. J
might not be well versed enough in the Bible to have
referred to these verses. This is far from the case. His
occupation requires that he know those verses. The fact of
the matter is that I have had an ongoing correspondence with
Mr. J for a number of months now which he has now asked be
publicized. In this correspondence, many of these
fundamental verses were dealt with in detail and refuted for
various reasons. This is why he did not quote them here.
However, in order that all may benefit from this information
we will quote these same verses that he has elected not to.
We will also study the other verses he has presented.
Next
Page
|