2.2 A small sampling of these
contradictions (Part 1)
"And the chief
priests and all the council sought for witness against Jesus
to put him to death; and found none. For many bare false
witness against him, but their witness agreed not together.
And there arose certain, and bare false witness against him,
saying, We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is
made with hands, and within three days I will build another
made without hands. But neither so did their witness agree
together."
Mark 14:56-59
Christian scholars have known, recognized, and documented
the many and varied contradictions to be found in the Bible
for centuries now. These contradictions are a direct result
of the continuous and unrelenting attempts to correct, fix,
and amend the Bible in order to make a given doctrine
"clear" to the reader. It is the masses who have been kept
in the dark in this regard. There is extensive historical
and scriptural evidence to be found in the books of the
Bible which support this conclusion. Many detailed examples
have been presented in this and other chapters of this book.
As shown above, some Christian scholars estimate the errors
in the Bible to be in the range of 48,800. This is why it
has become necessary for the Church to demand "blind faith"
from the masses.
Matthew is now recognized as not being the author of
Matthew (read for example Matthew 9:9). John is also
recognized as not being the author of John (read for example
John 21:24)... and on and on. These Christian scholars (not
Muslims) have even gone so far as to attempt to identify the
original documents from which these books were originally
derived, such as J, P, Y, Q,...etc.(see section 2.3) . For
centuries now, the Qur'an has been bearing witness that the
previous books of God had been modified by the hands of the
unscrupulous few. Even now when Christians and their
universities themselves recognize this to be a historical
fact they still do not bother to tell the masses. Some of
these Conservative scholars, such as Mr. F.F. Bruce, appear
to have completely given up on refuting the proof of
distortion and have now resorted to "spiritualizing" the
Bible and telling people in effect that the teachings of the
Bible are useful anyway even if we don't even know who the
inspired authors are.
Others will adamantly refuse to believe that anyone has
changed the word of God or that the Bible contains any
conflictions whatsoever no matter how much evidence is
presented. They are willing to either:
- Explain it away using abstraction to explain the
"true" meanings of the verses presented, or
- Explain it based upon assumptions of their own not
contained in the Bible, or
- Claim that these matters are all insignificant and
that the words remain the inspiration of God even if we
don't know who the "inspired" authors were and their
narrations contradict one another.
Even at that, they don't attempt to explain
all the contradictions presented. As we have
seen in the previous chapter, they have developed a system
where in one paragraph they manage to reduce many thousands
of discrepancies to "only a handful which are at all
important," and even before reaching the end of the
paragraph, even this "handful" is quickly brushed away as
being "only apparent discrepancies."
The problem in many cases is that it is human nature when
given a choice between two matters, to take the simpler of
the two, sometimes even against one's better judgment. This
is indeed how many people lose their life savings to people
who tell them that they will invest it for them in a "sure
thing," or people who encourage others to participate in
lotteries. We would not expect that our land would grow
fruit without our having to lavish upon it months of back
breaking work. We would not expect that a large company
would be willing to pay us a handsome weekly paycheck
without our actually doing some useful work for them,
however, when it comes to the ultimate reward and the
ultimate prize, the Paradise of the Lord of creation, now we
are told that it is no longer necessary to work for the
ultimate prize.
Paul has made salvation a very easy commodity to
come by in Christianity. They only have to "believe." No
actual work is required. No one has to work for their
salvation (Romans 3:28, etc.). Paul has brought for them the
"sure thing" and the short cut to salvation. The
commandments of Jesus (pbuh) which he himself observed
faithfully and fully up until the crucifixion, are all
discarded by Paul as old, decaying, and ready to vanish away
(Hebrews 8:13, etc.). The fact that Jesus (pbuh) himself
told his followers that observing the commandments and
selling their belongings shall make them "perfect" is
forgotten (Matthew 19:16-21). The fact that Jesus (pbuh)
himself commanded his followers to keep the commandments
until the end of time is also forgotten (Matthew 5:17-19).
All they need is "faith." They have already been saved. The
commandments are merely "extra."
In this chapter I have presented a table containing only
a small sampling of the many and varied contradictions
between the verses of the Bible. These are only some of the
very simple and obvious examples known today. Other more
serious ones require comparisons of many passages with each
other (see for example sections 5.2, 5.4 and 5.5) or with
historical or scientific knowledge. The reader is encouraged
to investigate these examples and to try to analyze
the excuses given for them objectively. Please do not
accept any and all attempts to justify these contradictions
without first analyzing them carefully. When someone tells
you that something was a scribal error then remember that
the transmitters of even the Old Testament claim that
every word and every letter was
faithfully counted and recorded
and thus, it would be impossible for
unintentional errors to creep in. This claim by
itself should refute all excuses.
For instance, the contradiction between Matthew 17:13 and
John 1:21 (point 16 below) is explained by Mr. J as:
"John is answering the question directly and literally,
he is not Elijah, he is John the son of Zechariah... John
was not interested in promoting all kind of speculation
about his identity, but to focus attention upon the one he
had been sent to prepare the way for." So, if Joe is a
vice principal, and someone asks the principal "Is Joe the
vice principal?" and the Principal says "yes," then it is OK
for Joe to say "I am not the vice principal" because he is
"talking within the context that he is Joe" and he
wants to "focus attention" on the principal?
Does this sound logical? These apologists' arguments are
usually presented with such confidence that people don't
bother to analyze them or look any further. The Jews
acceptance of Jesus as the Messiah hinges on John admitting
he is Elias (Mark 9:12). If John does not admit to being
Elias then Jesus' (pbuh) whole message will lose
credibility. Is this how John "focuses attention" on
Jesus?
It is inconceivable to think that John, peace be upon
him, a prophet of God, would intentionally lie especially in
a matter that can totally nullify Jesus' whole message. It
is also inconceivable that a prophet of God would remain a
prophet of God for many years before the coming of Jesus
(pbuh), fulfilling many prophesies, but neither know that he
was sent by God, nor be informed by God that He sent
him.
The Qur'an tells us that if the word of God were ever to
be tampered with by the hands of mankind then it will be
easy to detect this tampering by the contradictions which
will inevitably result. We read
"Do they not consider the Qur'an (with care)? Had it
been from other than Allah, they would have surely found
therein much discrepancy."
The noble Qur'an, Al-Nissa(4):82.
Even the Bible itself gives the same criteria for
discovering such modifications,
"For many bare false witness against him(Jesus), but
their witness agreed not together."
Mark 14:56
Next Page
|