Response by Randy Desmond to Infinite loop
problem
Simply put, when it says *it* is in the writings of the
earlier prophets, it may be referring to the teachings of
the Qur'an, a reference to the Qur'an, etc.
When we say something is *in* something else do we mean
it is literally and completely in it?
"YOU are *in* trouble!"
Now do I mean YOU are somehow interrelated and a part of
the concept trouble? Or do I mean the word "YOU" is a subset
of the word "trouble"? Or is the meaning of "YOU" the same
as "trouble"? Or have I told you *how* YOU are in trouble?
No. Well in a similar manner, the author of the
contradiction should not assume "it is in" means "it is".
That is assuming one particular understanding of *how* it is
in the writings of earlier prophets. A contradiction is not
proven again. All praise is due to God.
Do we throw out the verse as illogical (that is what the
contradiction's author proposes) or do we throw out the
author(of the contradiction)'s analysis of the verse as
illogical?
|