|
Address to the Clergy
FRIENDS and brethren -- teachers of the Christian faith:
Will you believe us when we tell you the divine claims of
your religion are gone -- all swept away by the "logic of
history," and nullified by the demonstrations of science?
The recently opened fountains of historic law, many of
whose potent facts will be found interspersed through the
pages of this work, sweep away the last inch of ground on
which can be predicated the least show for either the divine
origin of the Christian religion, or the divinity of Jesus
Christ.
For these facts demonstrate beyond all cavil and
criticism, and with a logical force which can leave not the
vestige of a doubt upon any unbiased mind, that all its
doctrines are an outgrowth from older heathen systems.
Several systems of religion essentially the same in
character and spirit as that religion now known as
Christianity, and setting forth the same doctrines,
principles and precepts, and several personages filling a
chapter in history almost identical with that of Jesus
Christ, it is now known to those who are up with the
discoveries and intelligence of the age, were venerated in
the East centuries before a religion called Christian, or a
personage called Jesus Christ were known to history.
Will you not, then, give it up that your religion is
merely a human production, reconstructed from heathen
materials -- from oriental systems several thousand years
older than yours -- or will you continue, in spite of the
unanimous and unalterable verdict of history, science, facts
and logic, to proclaim to the world the now historically
demonstrated error which you have so long preached, that God
is the author of your religion, and Jesus Christ a Deity-
begotten Messiah? Though you may have heretofore honestly
believed these doctrines to be true, you can now no longer
plead ignorance as an excuse for propagating such gigantic
and serious errors, as they are now overwhelmingly
demonstrated by a thousand facts of history to be untrue.
You must abandon such exalted claims for your religion, or
posterity will mark you as being "blind leaders of the
blind." They will heap upon your honored names their
unmitigated ridicule and condemnation. They will charge you
as being either deplorably ignorant, or disloyal to the
cause of truth. And shame and ignominy will be your portion.
The following propositions (fatal to your claims for
Christianity) are established beyond confutation by the
historical facts cited in this work, viz: --
- There were many cases of the miraculous birth of Gods
reported in history before the case of Jesus Christ.
- Also many other cases of Gods being born of virgin
mothers.
- Many of these Gods, like Christ, were (reputedly)
born on the 25th of December.
- Their advent into the world, like that of Jesus
Christ, is in many cases claimed to have been foretold by
"inspired prophets."
- Stars figured at the birth of several of them, as in
the case of Christ.
- Also angels, shepherds, and magi, or "wise men."
- Many of them, like Christ, were claimed to be of
royal or princely descent.
- Their lives, like his, were also threatened in
infancy by the ruler of the country.
- Several of them, like him, gave early proof of
divinity.
- And, like him, retired from the world and fasted.
- Also, like him, declared, "My kingdom is not of this
world."
- Some of them preached a spiritual religion, too, like
his.
- And were "anointed with oil," like him.
- Many of them, like him, were "crucified for the sins
of the world."
- And after three days' interment "rose from the
dead."
- And, finally, like him, are reported as ascending
back to heaven.
- The same violent convulsions of nature at the
crucifixion of several are reported.
- They were nearly all called "Saviors," "Son of God."
"Messiah," "Redeemer," "Lord," etc.
- Each one was the second member of the trinity of
"Father, Son and Holy Ghost."
- The doctrines of "Original Sin," "Fall of Man," "The
Atonement," "The Trinity," "The Word," "Forgiveness," "An
Angry God." "Future Endless Punishment," etc., etc. (see
the author's "Biography of Satan,") were a part of the
religion of each of these sin-atoning Gods, as found set
forth in several oriental bibles and holy books," similar
in character and spirit to the Christian's bible, and
written, like it, by "inspired and holy men" before the
time of either Christ or Moses (before Moses, in some
cases, at least). All these doctrines and declarations,
and many others not here enumerated, the historical
citations of this work abundantly prove, were taught in
various oriental heathen nations centuries before the
birth of Christ, or before Christianity, as a religion,
was known in the world.
Will you, then, after learning these facts, longer dare
assert that Christianity is of divine emanation, or claim a
special divine paternity for its author. Only the priest,
who loves his salary more than the cause of truth (and I
fear this class are numerous,) or who is deplorably ignorant
of history will have the effrontery or audacity to do so.
For the historical facts herein set forth as clearly prove
such assumptions to be false, as figures can demonstrate the
truth of any mathematical problem. And no logic can
overthrow, and no sophistry can set aside these facts.
They will stand till the end of time in spite of your
efforts either to evade, ignore, or invalidate them.
We will here briefly state --
WHY ALL THE ANCIENT RELIGIONS WERE ALIKE.
Two causes are obviously assignable for Christianity in
all its essential features and phases, being so strikingly
similar to the ancient pagan systems which preceded it, as
also the close analogies of all the principal systems, whose
doctrines and practical teachings have found a place on the
pages of history.
- The primary and constituent elements and properties
of human nature being essentially the same in all
countries and all centuries, and the feeling called
Religion being a spontaneous outgrowth of the devotional
elements of the human mind, the coincidence would
naturally produce similar feelings, similar thoughts,
similar views and similar doctrines on the 'subject of
religion in different countries, however widely
separated. This accounts in part for the analogous
features observable in all the primary systems of
religious faith, which have flourished in the past
ages.
- A more potent cause, however, for the proximate
identity extending to such an elaborate detail, as is
evinced by the foregoing schedule, is found in the
historical incident which brought the disciples of the
various systems of worship together, face to face, in the
then grand religious emporium of the world -- the royal
and renowned city of Alexandria, the capital of Egypt.
Here, drawn together by various motives and influences,
the devotee of India (the devout disciple of Buddhism),
the ever-prayerful worshipper of "Mithra, the Mediator,"
the representatives of the crucified Quexalcoate of
Mexico, the self-denying Essene, the superstitious
Egyptian, the godly Chaldean, the imitative Judean
founders of Christianity, and the disciples of other
sin-atoning Gods, met and interchanged ideas, discussed
their various dogmas, remolded their doctrines, and
recast and rehabilitated their systems of religious faith
by borrowing from each other, and from other systems
there represented. In this way all became remarkably
similar and alike in all their doctrines and details. And
thus the mystery is solved, and the singular resemblance
of all the ancient systems of religion satisfactorily
accounted for. (For a fuller explanation of this matter,
see Chapters XXX and
XXXI of this work.)
In conclusion, please note the following points: --
- The religious conceptions of the Old Testament are as
easily traced to heathen sources as those of the New
Testament. But we are compelled to exclude such an
exposition from this work.
- The comparative exhibition of the doctrines and
teachings of twenty bibles which proves them to be in
their leading features essentially alike (originally
designed for this volume), is found to be, when
completed, of sufficient magnitude to constitute a volume
of itself.
- Here I desire to impress upon the minds of my
clerical brethren the important fact, that the gospel
histories of Christ were written by men who had formerly
been Jews (see Acts xxi. 20), and probably possessing the
strong proclivity to imitate and borrow which their bible
shows was characteristic of that nation; and being
written many years after Christ's death, according to
that standard Christian author, Dr. Lardner, it was
impossible, under such circumstances, for them to
separate (if they had desired to) the real facts and
events of his life from the innumerable fictions and
fables then afloat everywhere relative to the heathen
Gods who had pre-enacted a similar history. Two reasons
are thus furnished for their constructing a history of
Christ almost identical with that of other Gods, as shown
in chapters XXX,
XXXI and
XXXII of this work.
- The singular and senseless defense of your now
tottering system we have known to be attempted by members
of your order, by the self-complacent soliloquy
"Christianity, whether divine or human, is good enough
for me." But such a subterfuge betrays both a weak mind
and a weak cause. The disciples of all the oriental
systems cherished a similar feeling and a similar
sentiment. And the deluded followers of Brigham Young
exclaimed in like manner, "I want nothing better than
Mormonism." "Snakes, lizards and frogs are good enough
for me," a South Sea Islander once exclaimed to a
missionary, when a reform diet was proposed. Such logic,
if universally adopted, would keep the world eternally in
barbarism. No progress can be made where such sentiments
prevail. The truth is, no system of religion, whatever
its ostensible marks of perfection, can long remain "good
enough" for aspiring and progressive minds, unless
occasionally improved, like other institutions. And then
it should be borne in mind, that our controversy does not
appertain so much to the character as to the origin of
the Christian religion. Our many incontrovertible proofs,
that it is of human and heathen origin, proves at the
same time that it is an imperfect system, and as such,
needing occasional improvement, like other institutions.
And its assumed perfection and divine origin which have
always guarded it from improvement, amply accounts for
its present corrupt, immoral, declining and dying
condition. And it will ere long die with paralysis,
unless its assumption of divine perfection is soon
exchanged for the principles of improvement and
reconstruction. This policy alone can save it.
- We will here notice another feeble, futile and
foolish expedient we have known resorted to by persons of
your order to save your sinking cause when the evidence
is presented with such cogency as to admit of no
disproof, that all the important doctrines of
Christianity were taught by older heathen systems before
the era of Christ. The plea is, that those systems were
mere types, or ante-types, of the Christian religion. But
this plea is of itself a borrowed subterfuge of
heathenism, and is moreover devoid of evidence. The
ancient Egyptians, also the Greeks, claimed that
Brahminism was a type, or ante-type, of their religious
systems. And Mohammedans now claim that both Judaism and
Christianity were designed by God as foreshadowing types
of religion of the Koran. And the disciples of more than
a thousand systems of religion which have flourished in
past ages, could have made such logic equally available
in showing, in each case, that every system preceding
theirs was designed by Infinite Wisdom as simply a
typical or ante-typical forerunner of theirs. How
ridiculous and senseless, therefore, is the argument thus
shown to be when critically examined in the light of
history! So much so as scarcely to merit a serious
notice.
- Here permit us to say that we believe Christianity to
be not only of human origin, but of natural origin also;
that is, a natural outgrowth, like other systems, of the
religious elements of the human mind -- a hypothesis
which accounts most beautifully for the numerous human
imperfections now visible in nearly every line of its
teachings. Those imperfections correspond exactly to the
imperfect minds which produced it.
- And we believe that the principle teacher of
Christianity, "the man Christ Jesus," possessed a very
exalted and superior mind for that age in the moral and
religions departments, and in the intellectual to some
extent also. But his superiority in these respects was
not probably greater than that of Zera Colburn or Henry
Safford in the mathematical department. And all probably
derived their peculiar extraordinary traits of mind from
the same causes -- that of strong psychological influence
impressed upon the mind of the mothers prior to their
births. Had these ante-natal influences been as well
understood then as now, we presume Christ would have
escaped the fate of an exaltation to the Godhead.
- In conclusion, permit us to say that the numerous and
overwhelming facts of this work render it utterly
impossible that the exalted claims you put forth for your
religion and its assumed author (that of a divine
character) can be true. And posterity will so decide,
whether you do or not.
Cherishing for you naught but feelings of kindness and
brotherly love, and desiring to promote the truth, we will
answer any question, or discuss any proposition embraced in
this work you may desire.
Your brother,
KERSEY GRAVIES.
|