2.1 Christian scholars
recognize contradictions (Part 2)
In all, Tischendorf uncovered over 14,800
"corrections" to the manuscript by nine (some say
ten) separate "correctors," which had been applied to this
one manuscript over a period from 400AD to 1200AD (see Fig.
1). Although he was well known to be quite ruthless and
unscrupulous in his dealings with his fellow Christian,
still, he strove in his dealings with his holy texts
themselves to be as honest and sincere as humanly possible.
For this reason he could not understand how the scribes
could have so continuously and so callously
"allow themselves to bring in here and there changes,
which were not simple verbal ones, but materially affected
the meaning" or why they "did not shrink from cutting
out a passage or inserting one."
Fig.1. 14,800 "corrections" to only one Biblical
manuscript
In the book "The Story of the Manuscripts" by Rev. George
E. Merrill, the good Reverend quotes Prof. Arnold as
stating:
"there are not more than fifteen hundred to two
thousand places 2,000 errors in which there is any
uncertainty whatever as to the true text.."
this number being in the respected Professor's estimation
quite minuscule. Prof. Arnold then goes on to explain how
all of these "variant readings" are undeserving of his
attention with only about a dozen being of any doctrinal
importance. In this manner, many thousands of additions,
omissions, and "corrections" of the church over the ages are
suddenly transformed to only a dozen and then quickly
reduced to none. Notice how casually and quickly centuries
of tampering with the text of the "inspired word of God" is
brushed off and justified?.
The reader is encouraged to go back and read all of these
inserted verses that the conservative Trinitarian scholars
themselves now admit were later forgeries of the Church.
Notice the intricate detail that is to be found in them.
Notice the attention to the minutest aspect that is lavished
upon these inserted verses. Notice how "spiritual" they are.
Notice how truly "inspired" they are. What does all of this
tell us?
Please keep in mind that these are only but a few of the
most outstanding of these discrepancies. In many cases the
translators appear to have been unable to determine the true
wording in any truly scientific and unbiased fashion, thus,
they appear to have been reduced to such actions as choosing
the version adopted by the majority of the "ancient
authorities." I am sure no one will mistake this for a truly
scientific determination (e.g. perhaps the minority version
is found in the most ancient manuscripts, as seen
above). Think about it.
"O People of the Book! Our messenger has come to you
revealing to you much of what you used to hide of the Book
and forgiving much. There has come to you from Allah a light
and a plain scripture"
The noble Qur'an, Al-Maida(5):15
As we have seen, these are not simply the ramblings of a
small number of obscure crackpot Christian-haters. This
information has become so well recognized and acknowledged
in the Christian West today that even their own
encyclopedias affirm it, and although no one will ever
mistake an encyclopedia for an official Christian reference,
still, this does go to show the extent that this information
has become accepted in the West today. Grolier's
encyclopedia says under the heading "Jesus Christ":
"The Gospels According to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and
John, the first four books of the New Testament of the
Bible, are the principal sources for the life of Jesus.
These works are primarily testimonies to the faith of the
early Christian community, however, and have to be used
critically as evidence for the historical Jesus. The methods
include source, form, and redaction criticism...These
methods provide criteria to sift through the redaction and
tradition and reconstruct the message and the mission of the
historical Jesus...Application of the critical methods
described above reveals that the gospel tradition apparently
started originally with Jesus' baptism by John the Baptist
(Matt. 3:13-17; Mark 1:9-11; Luke 3:21-22; John 1:29-34).
The stories concerning the birth of Jesus were probably
later additions. These stories--the annunciations to Mary
and Joseph, their journey to Bethlehem for the Roman census,
and Jesus' birth there (Luke 2:1-7); the visits of the
shepherds (Luke 2:8-20) and the three magi from the East
(Matt. 2:1-12); and the flight of the family to Egypt to
escape the massacre of young boys that had been ordered by
King Herod (Matt. 2:13-23)--may be characterized
conveniently, if loosely, as 'Christological midrash,'
expressions of Christological faith cast into narrative
form. If there are any factual elements in them, these will
be found among the items on which Matthew and Luke agree:
the names of Mary, Joseph, and Jesus; the dating of Jesus'
birth toward the end of the reign of Herod the Great (d. 4
BC); and, less certainly, the Bethlehem location of the
birth" (emphasis added).
"The Five Gospels," is a 550 page book containing
translations of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and
John. It was the result of a six year study by 24 Christian
scholars from some of the most prestigious universities the
Western world. They decided to produce a translation of the
Gospels which would be uncolored by the translator's
personal faith. It was decided that this translation was to
give the reader an honest picture of what Jesus (pbuh) truly
said. They scanned the text for the words of Jesus (pbuh),
and collect an index of over 1,500 such sayings. They then
tested the validity of each of these sayings, one at a time,
to see whether Jesus (pbuh) truly said each one. They then
produced a fresh translation, color-coded to show authentic
Jesuit sayings and those of an unreliable nature. Their
conclusion (page 5) was:
"Eighty-two percent of the words ascribed to
Jesus in the gospels were not actually spoken by him."
They go on to reveal that:
"biblical scholars and theologians alike have learned
to distinguish the Jesus of history from the Christ of
faith. It has been a painful lesson for both the church and
scholarship. The distinction between the two figures is the
difference between a historical person who lived in a
particular time and place...and a figure who has been
assigned a mythical role, in which he descends from heaven
to rescue humankind and, of course, eventually returns
there."
Well then, if 82% of the "words of Jesus" found in
the Bible were apparently never spoken by him then where did
they come from? Some of the sources demonstrated by the
authors are:
"The concept of plagiarism was unknown in the ancient
world. Authors freely copied from predecessors without
acknowledgment. Sages became the repository of free-floating
proverbs and witticisms. For the first Christians, Jesus was
a legendary sage: it was proper to attribute the world's
wisdom to him. The proverb in Mark 2:17, for example, is
attested in secular sources (Plutarch and Diogenes for
example)...in the parallel to the Markan passage, Matthew
adds a sentence taken from the prophet Hosea (Matt 9:13)."
Also:
"Hard sayings are frequently softened in the process
of transmission to adapt them to the conditions of daily
living...Variations in difficult saying often betray the
struggle of the early Christian community to interpret or
adapt sayings to it's own situations... Matthew's version of
the aphorism "The last will be first and the first
last"(Matt 20:16) is softened in Mark 10:31 to "MANY of the
first will be last, and of the last MANY will be first"."
And probably most revealing:
"Christian conviction eventually overwhelms Jesus: he
is made to confess what Christians had come to believe...The
contrast between Christian language or viewpoint and the
language or viewpoint of Jesus is a very important clue to
the real voice of Jesus, the language of Jesus was
distinctive, as was his style and perspective."
The above is only a very small sampling of the very large
cache of evidence clearly showing the Bible to have been
seriously distorted and altered. To this day it is being
continuously edited, corrected, and modified. This is not to
say that Christians are not good and honest people in search
of the truth. Quite the opposite. Among them are some of the
most decent and moral people on this earth. The goal of this
book is only to show that the Christian faith as it stands
today is not the same one preached by Jesus peace be upon
him to his followers nineteen hundred years ago. This is
exactly what the Qur'an has been asserting for over fourteen
hundred years now.
"O People of the Book! Why do you reject the Signs of
God, when you [yourselves] bear witness [to
their truth]?. O People of the Book! Why do you clothe
Truth with falsehood, and conceal the Truth, while you have
knowledge?"
The noble Qur'an, A'al-Umran(3):70-71
"Say: 'O People of the Book! Why do you reject the
Signs of God, when God is Himself witness to all you do?'
Say: 'O People of the Book! Why do you obstruct those who
believe from the path of God, Seeking to make it crooked,
while you were yourselves witnesses? But God is not unaware
of what you do'"
The noble Qur'an, A'al-Umran(3):98-99
"Truly, the Religion in the Sight of God is Islam
(literally: "the submission"). Nor did those who were given
the scripture dissent therefrom except after knowledge had
come to them, through envy of each other. But whosoever
disbelieves in the Signs of God, [then surely,] God
is swift in calling to account."
The noble Qur'an, A'al-Umran(3):19
"They are not all alike. Of the People of the
Scripture there is a party who stand [for that which is
right], they recite the revelations of Allah throughout
the night, falling prostrate [before Him]."
The noble Qur'an, A'al-Umran(3):113
"And there are, certainly, among the People of the
Book, those who believe in God, and in that which was sent
down unto you, and in that which was sent down unto them,
humbling themselves before God: They will not sell the Signs
of God for a miserable gain! For them is a reward with their
Lord, and God is swift to take account."
The noble Qur'an, A'al-Umran(3):199
"O people of the Book! Now has come unto you Our
messenger, revealing to you much of what you used to hide in
the Book, and passing over much. Indeed, there has come to
you from God a light and a plain Scripture"
The noble Qur'an, Al-Maida(5):15
Next Page
|